Techno Press
Tp_Editing System.E (TES.E)
Login Search
You logged in as...

was
 
CONTENTS
Volume 40, Number 2, February 2025
 


Abstract
Mixed passenger and freight railway is a common form in rail transportation, while the intersection of a streamlined electric-multiple-unit (EMU) train and a blunt freight train in a same tunnel may lead to unforeseen adverse effects due to differences in shape configurations. This paper examines the aerodynamic interactions that occur when these two types of trains pass each other in a tunnel. A three-dimensional, compressible, and unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations along with the RNG k-ε turbulence model is employed for numerical solution, which was validated by experiments. The results indicate that the freight train experienced 45% higher initial compressive pressure rise and a 75% greater initial pressure gradient compared to the EMU upon tunnel entry. However, the peak-to-peak pressure for leading car of the EMU is 39% greater than that of the freight train, with an average increase of 18% per vehicle. Slipstream analysis shows the EMU has uniform rearward flow at both sides, while the freight train exhibits asymmetric slipstream directions. During the intersection of EMU and freight trains, the average drag on the freight train's leading car is 65% higher than that on the EMU. However, the maximum peak-to-peak lateral force occurs when the noses of the freight train and EMU meet, with the EMU exhibiting a 23% higher risk of overturning compared to the freight train. The findings could inform the practical engineering operations related to mixed passenger and freight railway.

Key Words
aerodynamic loads; EMU; freight train; railway tunnel; slipstream; transient pressure

Address
Wenhui Li:1)School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, PR China
2)Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215131, PR China

Yifan Gu:1)School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, PR China
2)Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215131, PR China

Yelin Deng:1)School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, PR China
2)Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215131, PR China

Weifeng Zhao:1)School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, PR China
2)Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215131, PR China

Xueliang Fan:1)School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, PR China
2)Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215131, PR China

Abstract
Flexible suspended pedestrian bridge (FSPB) is a distinctive structure with a taut catenary shape in which separated deck modules are supported by suspension cables. FSPBs are characterized by high flexibility and large deformation arcs due to their low structural stiffness and damping, exhibiting significant aeroelastic interactions between modes. This study focused on flutter, an aeroelastic instability issue, in FSPBs. Wind tunnel tests and numerical analyses were conducted on two deck designs: open grating (OG), which minimizes air resistance, and solid deck (SD), which fully blocks the deck grating. Results showed that SD exhibited relatively vulnerable aeroelastic behavior, while the OG demonstrated greater stability against flutter. Numerical analysis explored the mode coupling of the entire bridge, examining the influence of lateral modes and degrees of freedom (DOF) on the onset of coupled flutter in the SD. The applicability of a two-dimensional (2-D) wind tunnel test setup was also examined. Additionally, the study identified the developing mechanism of torsional-vertical coupled flutter and key parameters influencing critical modes using 2-D wind tunnel tests and time-domain flutter analysis.

Key Words
aeroelastic flutter analysis; coupled flutter; flexible suspended pedestrian bridge (FSPB); wind tunnel test

Address
Sanghyeon Lee:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

Youchan Hwang:Floating Infrastructure Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

Ho-Kyung Kim:1)Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea
2)Floating Infrastructure Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea
3)Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

Abstract
This study generated three types of turbulence fields in a wind tunnel by changing the size of grid holes and grid plates. The buffeting force characteristics of the main beam under different turbulent flow fields are discussed. In addition, the narrowband synthetic random flow generation (NSRFG) turbulent inlet method was used to conduct large eddy simulation (LES) of -shaped beam under different turbulent inflow flows-shaped beams. This study presents a grid generation strategy for LES based on the NSRFG, discusses the horizontal decay law of turbulent wind parameters, and provides a method for setting inlet turbulent wind parameters. Finally, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) was carried out by extracting the numerical simulation data of key parts around the main beam, and the influence mechanism of the turbulent wind parameters on the buffeting force was discussed. The results indicate that the mean wind speed and turbulence intensity have relatively small effects on the horizontal decay function of the turbulence parameters. By contrast, the turbulent integral scale has a significant impact on the horizontal decay function of the turbulent wind parameters. Turbulence parameters can change the intensity, position, and shape of the vortices around the model, thereby altering its surface pressure.

Key Words
decay law; LES; POD; turbulent wind parameters;

Address
Zhengfeng Shen:1)School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, West Anhui University, Lu'an, 237012, Anhui, China
2)Department of Structure Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
3)Changjiang Jinggong Steel Structure (Group) Co., Ltd, Lu'an, 237161, Anhui, China

Feng Wang:School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an, 710064, Shaanxi, China

Chengdong Feng:Tianjin Key Laboratory of Prefabricated Buildings and Intelligent Construction, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering,
Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

Hua Xia: Changjiang Jinggong Steel Structure (Group) Co., Ltd, Lu'an, 237161, Anhui, China

Abstract
As train speed becomes faster, the aerodynamic load they face also increases, which can create safety risks for maglev trains when two trains meet. To address this, the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) approach was used to assess the aerodynamic coefficients of the guideway and the vehicles. The aerodynamic pressure of the vehicle surface, which is obtained by CFD, is verified by field measurement results. Then, a dynamic analysis model of maglev train-guideway systems under the train-induced wind effect was presented. Finally, the dynamic responses of the maglev trains and the guideways during the meeting of the two trains were analyzed. The effects of train speed and line spacing were explored in detail. The results show that the change of the aerodynamic coefficients of the head car of the 3-car train is the most drastic during the meeting of the two trains. Coupling vibration analyses demonstrate that there are strong effects on the lateral vibration of the car body and less impact on the guidance gap. When the train speed is 430 km/h, the peak values of acceleration for two trains passing each other are approximately five times as large as that of a single train passing. On this basis, an optimization measure is proposed, and the line spacing of the maglev line is increased from 5.1 m to 5.6 m, which will greatly reduce the aerodynamic coefficient and lateral acceleration of the train by about 20%.

Key Words
aerodynamic coefficient; dynamic response; maglev train-guideway system; meeting of two trains; train-induced wind effect

Address
Xiangfu Tian:1)State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2)State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756 Chengdu, China

Huoyue Xiang:State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756 Chengdu, China

Hao Hu:State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756 Chengdu, China

Yongle Li:1)State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2)State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756 Chengdu, China

Abstract
Significant vertical displacement caused by ice shedding from conductors may increase the risk of electrical accidents such as flashover. Ice shedding often occurs with joint actions of wind, which affects the jump height of transmission lines. The shielding effect of bundled conductors leads to uneven ice accretion among sub-conductors, resulting in variations in the wind attack angle along the transmission line, which significantly influences on the wind load on the conductor. This paper firstly established a finite element model of a practical iced transmission line for dynamic response analysis of ice shedding. To accurately determine the wind load on bundled conductors, the aerodynamic force coefficients of the conductors were updated in real-time by extracting the torsion angle response. Parametric analysis was also conducted in detail to investigate the impact of uneven ice accretion among sub-conductors, ice thickness, and wind velocity on the iced-shedding jump height of the transmission line.

Key Words
bundled conductors; ice shedding; jump height; transmission line; uneven ice accretion

Address
Mingfeng Huang:1)College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, China
2)College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, 100 East Daxue Road, Xixiangtang District, Nanning, China

Changzheng Chi:College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, China

Yi Gu:China Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., 68 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, China

Yuelong Zhang:China Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., 68 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, China

Zidi Zhu:College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, China


Techno-Press: Publishers of international journals and conference proceedings.       Copyright © 2026 Techno-Press ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
P.O. Box 33, Yuseong, Daejeon 34186 Korea.
General Inquiries: info@techno-press.com / Journal Administration: admin@techno-press.com