Buy article PDF
The purchased file will be sent to you
via email after the payment is completed.
US$ 35
|
Earthquakes and Structures Volume 11, Number 2, August 2016 , pages 195-215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.195 |
|
|
|
Practical seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry historical buildings |
||
Stylianos I. Pardalopoulos, Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou
and Christos E. Ignatakis
|
||
| Abstract | ||
| Rehabilitation of historical unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings is a priority in many parts of the world, since those buildings are a living part of history and a testament of human achievement of the era of their construction. Many of these buildings are still operational; comprising brittle materials with no reinforcements, with spatially distributed mass and stiffness, they are not encompassed by current seismic assessment procedures that have been developed for other structural types. To facilitate the difficult task of selecting a proper rehabilitation strategy - often restricted by international treaties for non-invasiveness and reversibility of the intervention - and given the practical requirements for the buildings´ intended reuse, this paper presents a practical procedure for assessment of seismic demands of URM buildings - mainly historical constructions that lack a well-defined diaphragm action. A key ingredient of the method is approximation of the spatial shape of lateral translation, Φ, that the building assumes when subjected to a uniform field of lateral acceleration. Using Φ as a 3-D shape function, the dynamic response of the system is evaluated, using the concepts of SDOF approximation of continuous systems. This enables determination of the envelope of the developed deformations and the tendency for deformation and damage localization throughout the examined building for a given design earthquake scenario. Deformation demands are specified in terms of relative drift ratios referring to the in-plane and the out-of-plane seismic response of the building´s structural elements. Drift ratio demands are compared with drift capacities associated with predefined performance limits. The accuracy of the introduced procedure is evaluated through (a) comparison of the response profiles with those obtained from detailed time-history dynamic analysis using a suite of ten strong ground motion records, five of which with near-field characteristics, and (b) evaluation of the performance assessment results with observations reported in reconnaissance reports of the field performance of two neoclassical torsionally-sensitive historical buildings, located in Thessaloniki, Greece, which survived a major earthquake in the past. | ||
| Key Words | ||
| seismic assessment; historical and monumental buildings; unreinforced masonry structures (URM); pushover analysis; torsion | ||
| Address | ||
| tylianos I. Pardalopoulos, Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus Stylianos I. Pardalopoulos: Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou: Department of Civil Engineering, Lassonde Faculty of Engineering, York University, Canada Christos E. Ignatakis: Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece | ||