Buy article PDF
Instant access to
the full article PDF
for the next 48 hrs
US$ 35
|
Computers and Concrete Volume 20, Number 1, July 2017, pages 011-22 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.1.011 |
|
|
|
Improving the linear flexibility distribution model to simultaneously account for gravity and lateral loads |
||
AliReza Habibi and Mehdi Izadpanah
|
||
| Abstract [Full Text] | ||
| There are two methods to model the plastification of members comprising lumped and distributed plasticity. When a reinforced concrete member experiences inelastic deformations, cracks tend to spread from the joint interface resulting in a curvature distribution; therefore, the lumped plasticity methods assuming plasticity is concentrated at a zero-length plastic hinge section at the ends of the elements, cannot model the actual behavior of reinforced concrete members. Some spread plasticity models including uniform, linear and recently power have been developed to take extended inelastic zone into account. In the aforementioned models, the extended inelastic zones in proximity of critical sections assumed close to connections are considered. Although the mentioned assumption is proper for the buildings simply imposed lateral loads, it is not appropriate for the gravity load effects. The gravity load effects can influence the inelastic zones in structural elements; therefore, the plasticity models presenting the flexibility distribution along the member merely based on lateral loads apart from the gravity load effects can bring about incorrect stiffness matrix for structure. In this study, the linear flexibility distribution model is improved to account for the distributed plasticity of members subjected to both gravity and lateral load effects. To do so, a new model in which, each member is taken as one structural element into account is proposed. Some numerical examples from previous studies are assessed and outcomes confirm the accuracy of proposed model. Also comparing the results of the proposed model with other spread plasticity models illustrates glaring error produced due to neglecting the gravity load effects. | ||
| Key Words | ||
| distributed plasticity; reinforced concrete; inelastic deformations; linear flexibility distribution; gravity load | ||
| Address | ||
| AliReza Habibi: Department of Civil Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran Mehdi Izadpanah: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||