Buy article PDF
The purchased file will be sent to you
via email after the payment is completed.
US$ 35
|
Computers and Concrete Volume 18, Number 3, September 2016 , pages 297-317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.18.3.297 |
|
|
|
Stud reinforcement in beam-column joints under seismic loads |
||
Gholamreza Abdollahzadeh and Saeed Eilbeigi Ghalani
|
||
| Abstract | ||
| Current codes recommend large amounts of shear reinforcement for reinforced concrete beamcolumn joints that causes significant bar congestion. Increase in congestion of shear reinforcement in joint core (connection zone), leads to increase accomplishment problems. The congestion may also lead to diameter limitations on the beam bars relative to the joint dimensions. Using double headed studs instead of conventional closed hoops in reinforced concrete beam-column joints reduces congestion and ensures easier assembly of the reinforcing cage. The purpose of this research is evaluating the efficiency of the proposed reinforcement. In this way, 10 groups of exterior beam-column joints are modeled. Each group includes 7 specimens by different reinforcing details in their joint core. All specimens are modeled by using of ABAQUS and analyzed subjected to cyclic loading. After verification of analytical modeling with an experimental specimen, 3D nonlinear specimens are modeled and analyzed. Then, the effect of amount and arrangement of headed studs on ductility, performance, ultimate strength and energy absorption has been studied. Based on the results, all joints reinforced with double headed studs represent better performance compared with the joints without shear transverse reinforcement in joints core. The behavior of the former is close to joints reinforced with closed hoops and cross ties according to the seismic design codes. By adjusting the arrangement of double-headed studs, the decrease in ductility, performance, ultimate momentresistant and energy absorption reduce to 2.61%, 0.90%, 0.90% and 1.66% respectively compared with the joints reinforced by closed hoops on the average. Since the use of headed studs reduces accomplishment problems, these amounts are negligible. Therefore, use of double-headed studs has proved to be a viable option for reinforcing exterior beam-column joints. | ||
| Key Words | ||
| exterior RC beam-column joint; ductility; performance; ultimate resistant moment; energy absorption | ||
| Address | ||
| Gholamreza Abdollahzadeh: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Babol, Iran Saeed Eilbeigi Ghalani: Department of Civil Engineering, Shomal University, Amol, Iran | ||