Volume 7, Number 3, July 2022 , pages 229-251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2022.7.3.229 |
||
Validation of the seismic response of an RC frame building with masonry infill walls - The case of the 2017 Mexico earthquake |
||
Tania C. Albornoz, Leonardo M. Massone, Julian Carrillo, Francisco Hernández and Yolanda Alberto
|
||
Abstract | ||
In 2017, an intraplate earthquake of Mw 7.1 occurred 120 km from Mexico City (CDMX). Most collapsed structural buildings stroked by the earthquake were flat slab systems joined to reinforced concrete (RC) columns, unreinforced masonry, confined masonry, and dual systems. This article presents the simulated response of an actual six-story RC frame building with masonry infill walls that did not collapse during the 2017 earthquake. It has a structural system similar to that of many of the collapsed buildings and is located in a high seismic amplification zone. Five 3D numerical models were used in the study to model the seismic response of the building. The building dynamic properties were identified using an ambient vibration test (AVT), enabling validation of the building's finite element models. Several assumptions were made to calibrate the numerical model to the properties identified from the AVT, such as the presence of adjacent buildings, variations in masonry properties, soil-foundation-structure interaction, and the contribution of non-structural elements. The results showed that the infill masonry wall would act as a compression strut and crack along the transverse direction because the shear stresses in the original model (0.85 MPa) exceeded the shear strength (0.38 MPa). In compression, the strut presents lower stresses (3.42 MPa) well below its capacity (6.8 MPa). Although the non-structural elements were not considered to be part of the lateral resistant system, the results showed that these elements could contribute by resisting part of the base shear force, reaching a force of 82 kN. | ||
Key Words | ||
ambient vibration test; infill wall; masonry; Mexico earthquake; nonlinear model; RC frame | ||
Address | ||
Tania C. Albornoz: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile, Blanco Encalada 2002, Santiago, Chile Leonardo M. Massone: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile, Blanco Encalada 2002, Santiago, Chile Julian Carrillo: Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, UMNG, Cra. 11, Bogotá, Colombia Francisco Hernández: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile, Blanco Encalada 2002, Santiago, Chile Yolanda Alberto: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile, Blanco Encalada 2002, Santiago, Chile | ||